From: | Alan Hourihane <alanh@×××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-alt@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-alt] portage, openpty and interix | ||
Date: | Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:54:03 | ||
Message-Id: | 1256388840.4565.32.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-alt] portage, openpty and interix by Fabian Groffen |
1 | On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 11:20 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
2 | > On 23-10-2009 18:24:54 +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote: |
3 | > > Damn. It ain't portage in my case. Must be some dependency. Off to do |
4 | > > some regression testing. |
5 | > |
6 | > how about this python wrapper that used to be a symlink only? |
7 | > |
8 | > It introduces at least an extra fork/exec. |
9 | |
10 | Don't think so, but the "Performing Global Updates" repetitiveness is |
11 | causing much more grief at the moment. |
12 | |
13 | Alan. |