| 1 |
> |
| 2 |
> On 16-01-2009 15:09:21 +0100, Markus Duft wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > > Please speak up, if you _don't_ want me to do this as a portage |
| 4 |
> patch |
| 5 |
> > > in the |
| 6 |
> > > > prefix tree. That's what I want to do, if nobody has a problem |
| 7 |
> with |
| 8 |
> > > it ;) |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > Please don't. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Ok, so what else then? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Ignore my previous comment. Don't patch Portage. I see no problems in |
| 15 |
> applying it for every arch. So just get a patch on my desk so I can |
| 16 |
> commit it in Prefix Portage's sources. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Ok, here we go :) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Cheers, Markus |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> -- |
| 25 |
> Fabian Groffen |
| 26 |
> Gentoo on a different level |
Archives