Re: [gentoo-alt] os.statvfs in portage

[Fabian Groffen]

On 17-03-2008 22:29:18 +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> O.k,
>
> I've been using prefix portage 9380 for a while, and I've just upgraded
> to 9468 and now in pym/__init__.py there's a requirement for os.statvfs
> which the system I'm using doesn't currently have, and so portage
> bailed.
>
> I've commented out those few lines that use it to determine available
> disk space.
>
> I could go and implement statvfs on my system too, but shouldn't there
> be checks for these OS exported functionalities ??

I think so, yes.  I'll look into it later.  Just a note; I merely merge
changes from the trunk into the prefix branch, so there's a lot that I
assume to be ok just by the looks of it.  :/


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
-- 
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list