Re: [gentoo-alt] Mock up Linux bootstrap guide

[Fabian Groffen]

On 17-09-2007 10:54:27 +0200, rabbe@×××××××.se wrote:
> > On 14-09-2007 17:26:07 +0200, rabbe@×××××××.se wrote:
> >> Hi Fabian,
> >>
> >> yes, I emerged python every time whether needed or not. Trying your
> >> commands,

Is this the dreaded SLES 9 machine that also couldn't build a
compiler/linker?


> >> % head -n1 $EPREFIX/usr/lib/portage/pym/emerge/__init__.py
> >> #!/rh8/home-local/erarafo/g2/usr/bin/python -O
> >>
> >> % file $EPREFIX/usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/const.py
> >> /rh8/home-local/erarafo/g2/usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/const.py: ASCII
> >> English text
> >>
> >> % which python
> >> /rh8/home-local/erarafo/g2/usr/bin/python
> >>
> >> % python -c 'import portage.const ; print portage.const.EPREFIX'
> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
> >>   File "<string>", line 1, in ?
> >> ImportError: No module named const
> >
> > All looks fine, apart from this.  As far as I know, and looking at the
> > unpack phase of python should still be, that
> > 06_all_add_portage_search_path.patch adds the portage path to the
> > internal PYTHONPATH in python.
> >
> > It looks to me like either the patch wasn't applied for some reason, or
> > the emerged portage wasn't installed.  Are you sure it was emerged?
> >
>
> I re-ran the whole thing, this time collecting the console output. You can
> download it from this URL:
>
> <http://wb748077.bahnhofbredband.se/prefix-gentoo/g2.out.bz2>
>
> I had a quick look myself, there is no special complaint when the '06'
> patch is applied.
>
> I will leave the EPREFIX tree as is so that we can dig out any interesting
> pieces.


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
-- 
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list