Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@×××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Cc: Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Perl 5.16.x on Prefix ?
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:08:25
Message-Id: 5033A71D.2090402@fairlite.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] Perl 5.16.x on Prefix ? by Jeremy Olexa
1 On 08/21/12 15:34, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
2 > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Alan Hourihane <alanh@×××××××××××.uk> wrote:
3 >> Hi all,
4 >>
5 >> I talked to Jeremy about this last night, but it seems perl 5.16.x
6 >> hasn't been adjusted for Prefix.
7 >>
8 >> The patches aren't applied and it's a much reduced ebuild. Has anyone
9 >> tested 5.16.x on prefix yet ?
10 >>
11 >> Thanks,
12 >>
13 >> Alan.
14 >>
15 > Oh yes, perl-5.16 definately works just fine. I never said that it didn't =P
16 Sure, but my question was that I can't see where the patches are applied
17 via the eblits for prefix, which you didn't seem to know.
18
19 Alan.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] Perl 5.16.x on Prefix ? Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o>