Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] [prefix] tetex-3.0_p1-r3 unmask request
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:38:33
Message-Id: 20071027183808.GH678@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] [prefix] tetex-3.0_p1-r3 unmask request by Fabian Groffen
1 texlive is now in the tree. It doesn't have this problem (that was
2 never sorted out, but people upgrading from tetex to texlive face a side
3 effect of it too).
4
5 So from my perspective this will never be fixed, and you should use
6 texlive instead.
7
8
9 On 13-09-2007 12:58:34 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
10 > On 07-09-2007 20:03:08 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
11 > > On 02-09-2007 18:46:58 +0900, MATSUI Fe2+ Tetsushi wrote:
12 > > > I do also ebuild install and see the same output. Yes, you're right.
13 > > > Then, do ebuild qmerge and get pdflatex symlink installed. So, I'm
14 > > > right too.
15 > >
16 > > Indeed.
17 >
18 > It does NOT install pdflatex on both AMD64 Linux and Darwin 7, so I
19 > masked it again.
20 >
21 > On Linux I got confused with the system install of latex out there.
22 >
23 > Sorry.
24 >
25 >
26 > --
27 > Fabian Groffen
28 > Gentoo on a different level
29 > --
30 > gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list
31 >
32
33 --
34 Fabian Groffen
35 Gentoo on a different level
36 --
37 gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list