| 1 |
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 21:02 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 25-05-2007 14:01:06 -0500, Jason Pepas wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> What's your path? Where does the compiler come from? |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > well, I am assuming that prefix-launcher is meddling with my PATH, so I |
| 7 |
> > don't think I can easily tell you. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> >> Out of curiosity, did you ever try bootstrapping using |
| 10 |
> >> bootstrap-prefix.sh? If so, did that get past point 1.3 of |
| 11 |
> >> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/bootstrap-solaris.xml? |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > yeah, I started out using bootstrap-prefix.sh about a week ago. the first |
| 14 |
> > time I used it it worked, and then I started over from scratch a few days |
| 15 |
> > later and something was broken, so I decided to try out prefix-launcher. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Ok, that is vague, but indicates some problem with where prefix-launcher |
| 18 |
> gets the compiler from. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
When emerging coreutils with eprefix-bootstrap in stage 'basics', |
| 21 |
binutils-2.16.1 and gcc-4.1.2 are already from the new eprefix. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Maybe we should try to not be sticked to binutils-2.16.1 during |
| 24 |
bootstrap ? |
| 25 |
But wait, prefix-launcher can build binutils-2.17 without texinfo, |
| 26 |
although the patch[1] is not applied... |
| 27 |
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.alt/2386 |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Btw, I'm bootstrapping an eprefix on sparc-solaris2.9 now too (being one |
| 30 |
of the slowest machines here...) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
/haubi/ |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list |
Archives