| 1 |
On 12-09-2007 11:39:09 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 23:05 +0200, Rabbe Fogelholm wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I decided to make a first shot in an up-to-date Gentoo Linux |
| 4 |
> > environment; there couldn't be a friendlier environment could it? :-) |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Ehm, the risk that prefix-gentoo interferes with native-gentoo is much |
| 7 |
> higher than on non-gentoo linux, although I have prefix running on |
| 8 |
> native x86 gentoo. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Valid point. The risk of running prefix-gentoo on native-gentoo, is |
| 11 |
that you don't notice prefix-gentoo actually being wrong, because the |
| 12 |
non-prefixed components simply exists and are pretty good usable. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That said, prefix-gentoo should work fine (without conflicts also) on |
| 15 |
native-gentoo, but I'll be the last one who tries it out, as I want to |
| 16 |
be the first to hit an error in prefix-gentoo (and fix it). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 21 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list |
Archives