From: | Jon Woodring <woodring@××××.gov> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-alt@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-alt] [PREFIX] Bootstrap stable? |
Date: | Tue, 02 Apr 2019 22:31:54 |
Message-Id: | 20190402223143.eewvhwajojgcejxx@crescens |
1 | |
2 | |
3 | |
4 | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 | code{white-space: pre-wrap;} |
10 | span.smallcaps{font-variant: small-caps;} |
11 | span.underline{text-decoration: underline;} |
12 | div.column{display: inline-block; vertical-align: top; width: 50%;} |
13 | |
14 | |
15 | |
16 | |
17 | Is there an option for running the bootstrap script to make sure it is using non-tilde packages? (Or maybe latest prefix overlay patches, i.e.��is it a bug?) |
18 | I noticed that I couldn���t install prefix with glibc unless I set the package atom to the last non-tilde version (=sys-libs/glibc-2.27-r6). |
19 | FYI, it fails with the latest glibc complaining that it can���t find a proper Python environment, which I am guessing, that the patches from the prefix overlay don���t exist? (I���m just hazarding a wild guess.) |
20 | If it���s a bug, I can submit a bug report; I wasn���t sure if it was user error or not. |
21 | |
22 | |
23 | |
24 |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-alt] Re: [PREFIX] Bootstrap stable? | Benda Xu <heroxbd@g.o> |