Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Alexey Sokolov <alexey+gentoo@××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] [PATCH 0/2] Xvfb in test dependencies in Prefix
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 08:45:41
Message-Id: CAHK_jdi1qQZL7wkXNEbnfox-cT+u_jR90XJh1LnytYTXFifLAw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] [PATCH 0/2] Xvfb in test dependencies in Prefix by Fabian Groffen
1 Hi Fabian
2
3 You already merged it a couple of months ago. I sent it to -dev first,
4 got no response for a while, then sent it here.
5
6 ср, 13 янв. 2021 г. в 08:17, Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>:
7 >
8 > This sounds good, the eclass change we'd have to run by -dev though.
9 >
10 > On 29-10-2020 11:29:27 +0000, alexey+gentoo@××××××××.org wrote:
11 > > From: Alexey Sokolov <alexey+gentoo@××××××××.org>
12 > >
13 > > I'm running a prefix but tests of various packages are failing in virtx
14 > > command. I discovered that this is because virtualx doesn't depend on
15 > > xvfb in prefix. But after installing xorg-server[xvfb,-elogind] tests
16 > > pass.
17 > > elogind flag had to be disabled otherwise it brings pam as dependency.
18 > > So, attached are patches to prefix profile to disable elogind for
19 > > xorg-server, and to virtualx eclass to depend on it even in prefix.
20 > >
21 > > Alexey Sokolov (2):
22 > > profiles: prefix: mask USE=elogind in x11-base/xorg-server
23 > > virtualx.eclass: don't skip xvfb dependency on Prefix
24 > >
25 > > eclass/virtualx.eclass | 2 +-
26 > > profiles/features/prefix/package.use.mask | 4 ++++
27 > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
28 > >
29 > > --
30 > > 2.26.2
31 > >
32 > >
33 >
34 > --
35 > Fabian Groffen
36 > Gentoo on a different level

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] [PATCH 0/2] Xvfb in test dependencies in Prefix Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>