| 1 |
Fabian Groffen <mailto:grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 19-03-2008 11:42:21 +0100, Duft Markus wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Duft Markus <mailto:Markus.Duft@×××××××.at> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Fabian Groffen <mailto:grobian@g.o> wrote: <snip> |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> The rest can be done as described in the prefix-launcher bootstrap |
| 7 |
>>> WIKI [2]. Hope this works, i'm just about to bootstrap a new prefix |
| 8 |
>>> again too, but have problems with the SHA256 hashes, since |
| 9 |
>>> prefix-launcher uses python 2.4 (argl...). The currently only |
| 10 |
>>> solution i have is deleting any manifest that produces hash |
| 11 |
>>> failures. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> Arg, forgot something: at the stage mirrorconfig (when |
| 14 |
>> eprefix-launcher stops for the first time) you will want to svn up |
| 15 |
>> the prefix tree. I know at that time there is no svn client |
| 16 |
>> compiled, but you can use tortoise svn for windows for example. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I selected NFS support in the SFU installer, so I hope that it also |
| 19 |
> reasonably works, such that I can work over NFS with my dev-tree. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Wow, i never tried NFS with interix, but i think it should work (they |
| 22 |
dropped support for it inlater version though i think :)). |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> (But this idea may be a bit too much to ask for Windows...) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Maybe, yes :) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I just had another problem. Prefix-launcher uses "-strict digest", which |
| 30 |
means that it creates manifests with the 2.4 python, which again are |
| 31 |
b0rked then, so i again had to delete all Manifest files from the prefix |
| 32 |
tree after the final python 2.5 was used... What a mess. Could it be, |
| 33 |
that portage isn't listening to -strict anymore for Manifest |
| 34 |
verification? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Cheers, Markus |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> -- |
| 41 |
> Fabian Groffen |
| 42 |
> Gentoo on a different level |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives