1 |
On 03-04-2008 08:58:38 +0200, Stefan Hoelldampf wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, April 2, 2008 17:19, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
3 |
> > On 02-04-2008 16:55:30 +0200, Duft Markus wrote: |
4 |
> >> Used a) since i'm messing with environment anyway in the bootstrap |
5 |
> >> script, and i don't know what eprefix i will bootstrap at compile time, |
6 |
> >> so b) isn't possible. |
7 |
> >> Now the right python is found, but i have another problem: there is no |
8 |
> >> rpath hardcoded in python, so it doesn't find python2.5.so...... Need to |
9 |
> >> mess a little more with the environment :) |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > Then set your LDFLAGS to the appropriate values when you bootstrap |
12 |
> > python. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> LDFLAGS not being appropriately set might be the problem, but I had the |
15 |
> same problem on amd64-linux due to the missing /usr/lib -> /usr/lib64 |
16 |
> symlink. Emerging baselayout-prefix isn't able to create the symlink due |
17 |
> to the directory /usr/lib created by the bootstrapped portage using |
18 |
> bootstrap-prefix.sh. I've posted a possible patch for bootstrap-prefix.sh |
19 |
> in https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=183874#c9 |
20 |
|
21 |
Thanks! |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Fabian Groffen |
26 |
Gentoo on a different level |
27 |
-- |
28 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |