Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Aaron Wilson <tallest@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-alt] [PREFIX] portage masked?
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:24:26
Message-Id: AB550967-0A9F-486B-8A66-8424AAE6874C@gmail.com
1 On both of my Leopard 10.5.2 prefixed machines after a fresh sync I get:
2
3 $ emerge portage
4
5 These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
6
7 Calculating dependencies /
8 !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "sys-apps/portage" have been masked.
9 !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
10 request:
11 - sys-apps/portage-2.2.00.9300 (masked by: package.mask)
12 /Users/wilson/Library/Gentoo/usr/portage/profiles/default-prefix/
13 package.mask:
14 # Elias Pipping <pipping@g.o> (09 Fev 2008)
15 # There's a bug that causes a lot of pointless output with commands like
16 # emerge -u system
17
18 - sys-apps/portage-2.2.00.9271 (masked by: package.mask)
19 /Users/wilson/Library/Gentoo/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
20 # Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> (09 Feb 2008)
21 # First public test releases of portage-2.2
22
23 - sys-apps/portage-2.2.00.9233 (masked by: package.mask)
24
25 For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man
26 page or
27 refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
28
29 Thanks,
30 Aaron
31 --
32 gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] [PREFIX] portage masked? Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@×××××.com>