1 |
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:10:07 +0200 |
2 |
Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 20-10-2011 13:05:22 +0200, Burcin Erocal wrote: |
5 |
> > > Ok, ED doesn't make a difference here. Can you explain why the |
6 |
> > > host system is making world-writable files? What's its rationale |
7 |
> > > to force that on you? Can't you really not just sanitise that |
8 |
> > > (your umask?) |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:12:53 +0200 |
11 |
> > From: Alexander Dreyer <alexander.dreyer@×××××××××××××××.de> |
12 |
> > To: Burcin Erocal <burcin@××××××.org> |
13 |
> > Cc: gentoo-alt@l.g.o |
14 |
> > Subject: Re: Fw: [gentoo-alt] permission test |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > You can change these permissions afterwards, but newly generated |
17 |
> > files are world-writable in the first (this is enforced by the file |
18 |
> > server). Of course only formally, because the access is restricted |
19 |
> > by the toplevel ACLs. |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > It would already help me a lot, if the warning would not sleep for a |
22 |
> > second. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Ok, so would the tradeoff to give a warning and sleep only once (the |
25 |
> sleep perhaps is even misplaced here), instead of for every file be |
26 |
> acceptable? |
27 |
|
28 |
Yes, sleeping once per package should be OK. |
29 |
|
30 |
Thanks. |
31 |
|
32 |
Burcin |