Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Bacchella Fabrice <fabrice.bacchella@×××××××.com>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Another findutils failed (but on Solaris)
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 14:35:21
Message-Id: BA58E6BC-AE1F-45B6-B982-1E8E0538A473@exalead.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] Another findutils failed (but on Solaris) by Fabian Groffen
1 Le 8 mai 08 à 15:49, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
2
3 > On 08-05-2008 15:46:12 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
4 >>> I think that your way of bootstrapping 64-bits is causing the
5 >>> trouble.
6 >>> I have no problem compiling findutils using a Prefix compiler.
7 >>> Please
8 >>> try the bootstrap instructions, which differ slightly from yours.
9 >>> It
10 >>> does initial bootstrapping 32-bits, and continues 64-bits via a
11 >>> 64-native compiler.
12 >>
13 >> I tried this. No more success. When I download the patched
14 >> findutils, a
15 >> plain configure, make installed failed, even after an
16 >> unset CC CFLAGS CCC CXX CXXFLAGS LDFLAGS CPPFLAGS LD_LIBRARY_PATH
17 >> LANG
18 >> umask=0000
19 >
20 > I need to check. Workaround is to simply change the
21 > bootstrap_findutils() function to read
22 > bootstrap_gnu findutils 4.4.0
23 > (and nothing more)
24 > it will then use the gnu.org released findutils tarball. If that
25 > doesn't work, switch to an older version of findutils.
26
27 The problem is in Solaris and findutils 4.4.0 I think. I use a fully
28 patched Solaris and i think they broke something.
29
30 When I download it from gnu, do a ./configure ; make, it works
31 perfectly with Sun Workshop and brokes using gcc either with a 32 or
32 64 bits compilation.--
33 gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] Another findutils failed (but on Solaris) Bacchella Fabrice <fabrice.bacchella@×××××××.com>