| 1 |
Bacchella Fabrice wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Le 19 avr. 08 � 18:35, Jeremy a �crit : |
| 4 |
>> keywords. Maybe we can follow gentoo-x86 automagically on that |
| 5 |
>> one..but if we do, then the docs will get out of date again, because |
| 6 |
>> the process |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> PerhapsI don't understant what to mean. But something stable for |
| 9 |
> gentoo-x86 might be unstable for mac os or solaris. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
The gentoo-x86 tree is the main ebuild tree, not strictly related to the |
| 13 |
x86 arch. As in, the prefix tree is a subset of the gentoo-x86 tree |
| 14 |
(with specific changes). If we followed the tree then the prefix system |
| 15 |
packages would become stable for the arches when they became stable in |
| 16 |
the main tree. (ie. if a package was stable on x86 and not sparc in the |
| 17 |
main tree, then it would remain like that in the prefix tree) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Makes more sense now? Feel free to check it out at: |
| 20 |
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/ |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-Jeremy |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives