| 1 |
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:57:05PM -0600, matt hull wrote: |
| 2 |
> i think we should use stable and testing in the current tree. no different |
| 3 |
> from other hurds. after 30 days with no major bugs and tested mark the |
| 4 |
> package as stable. as you said you dont have any time, so you could just |
| 5 |
> leave it unstable till there is time |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I could imagine that with our limited user crowd, the chances that not |
| 8 |
after 30 days nobody actually installed the one or the other ebuild is |
| 9 |
quite good. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
If there would be a convenient voting solution, ppl could vote ebuilds |
| 12 |
to be marked stable. If then later some ebuilds turn out unstable, |
| 13 |
developers would know who's using them (for questions and betha |
| 14 |
testing). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
But I'm not aware of any particular voting solution that would be |
| 17 |
convenient to everyone (including the admin). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Dirk. |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list |
Archives