| 1 |
Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 15:18 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Hey peepz, |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> Triggered by last GMN, in which we got a little PR for haubi and jokey's |
| 7 |
>> efforts at Chemnitzer LinuxTage, I went looking at our project page(s), |
| 8 |
>> e.g. [1] and started wondering what the name of our project actually |
| 9 |
>> should be... Sofar we seem to have: |
| 10 |
>> - Gentoo/Alt:Prefix |
| 11 |
>> - Gentoo Prefix |
| 12 |
>> - Prefix |
| 13 |
>> - Prefix Portage |
| 14 |
>> - Prefixed Portage |
| 15 |
>> - Portage Prefix |
| 16 |
>> - Gentoo Prefixed Portage |
| 17 |
>> ... |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> Maybe it's time to get consistent, but to what? Any ideas, opinions? |
| 20 |
>> (everyone welcome to respond) |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> +1 for "Gentoo Prefix" (in opposite to "Gentoo Linux"): |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
I like "Gentoo Prefix" too. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
In my opinion, having something like "Prefix Portage" underemphasizes |
| 28 |
the amount of effort that has gone into the building up the actual |
| 29 |
Prefix package repository, whereas "Gentoo Prefix" encompasses the |
| 30 |
excellent work that goes into both the portage-prefix branch and the |
| 31 |
packages. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Just my $0.02. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Matt. |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives