| 1 |
On 03-10-2009 23:09:53 +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote: |
| 2 |
> Seems as though the ebuild's changed and dropped a few of the keywords |
| 3 |
> used to stop libffi being pulled in. And now I get ..... |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Calculating dependencies... done! |
| 9 |
> [ebuild U ] net-misc/wget-1.12 [1.11.4] USE="-idn% -ntlm%" |
| 10 |
> [ebuild UD] dev-lang/python-2.6.2-r01.4 [2.6.2-r2] |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> !!! The following update has been skipped due to unsatisfied |
| 13 |
> dependencies: |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> dev-lang/python:2.6 |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "virtual/libffi" have been masked. |
| 18 |
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your |
| 19 |
> request: |
| 20 |
> - virtual/libffi-0 (masked by: missing keyword) |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge |
| 23 |
> man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. |
| 24 |
> (dependency required by "dev-lang/python-2.6.2-r2" [ebuild]) |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> What happened ? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Good questions. I merged this change from gx86 already with the |
| 30 |
comment that this would probably break (again ...). Also in the ebuild, |
| 31 |
internal libffi is removed conditional now, but that would mean |
| 32 |
virtual/libffi would have to have keywords for ~mips and ~m68k now. |
| 33 |
It does not. Seems bugzie is down at the moment, so I can't check if |
| 34 |
there are already bugs for this issue. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 39 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives