| 1 |
On 10-05-2017 21:28:14 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 10 May 2017 09:47:41 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > IoW: you can just hope it's ok based on user feedback, or need a Prefix |
| 6 |
> > system/member to do it. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> So in short, I can ignore repoman saying its a fail, as long as there's |
| 9 |
> a satisfying dep in the prefix overlay? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I'll put that note in my notes, that's going to be really useful :) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Kentnl/ArchKeywording#Any_Prefix_Arch |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Feel free to correct the wording if Its wrong, I know its in my own space, but its |
| 16 |
> just a prototype until I can work out a good place to store it all. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Hah, I'm quoted now :) FWIW Prefix arches are not anywhere soon going |
| 19 |
to be "stable" keywords, so you can update your table for that one. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
If people want to help getting things keyworded, and they feel confident |
| 22 |
they are doing the right thing, I don't think any Prefix dev has a |
| 23 |
problem with keywords/fixes being added. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Thanks, |
| 26 |
Fabian |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 31 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives