| 1 |
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 09:49 +1100, Matt Michalowski wrote: |
| 2 |
> 2009/10/7 Alan Hourihane <alanh@×××××××××××.uk> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Can we put the ~m68k-mint back in ?? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Is portage going to be using features from libffi ?? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> If so, then maybe I need to port it. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Alan. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I think only Python's ctype library uses libffi - which according to |
| 17 |
> my quick grep, portage doesn't use. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> The gx86 tree now has libffi-3.0.9_rc1 - any luck with compiling that? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
No. Just the same. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Alan. |
Archives