| 1 |
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 07:52:16PM +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > > This is exactly the reason we are using wrappers that inject those |
| 4 |
> > > flags. If gcc and ld aren't first in your default search-path, |
| 5 |
> > > things |
| 6 |
> > > will get difficult. |
| 7 |
> > /usr/local/gentoo/usr/bin/gcc |
| 8 |
> > /usr/local/gentoo/usr/bin/i686-apple-darwin9-gcc |
| 9 |
> > /usr/local/gentoo/usr/bin/ld |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Those all are the wrappers ;) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Ah. Shouldn't it contain some tweaking of CFLAGS then? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
# strings /usr/local/gentoo/usr/bin/gcc | grep CFLAGS |
| 16 |
CFLAGS_%s |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> > michael@esgaroth:~ # otool -L /usr/local/gentoo/usr/lib/libglib-2.0.dylib |
| 19 |
> > /usr/local/gentoo/usr/lib/libglib-2.0.dylib: |
| 20 |
> > /usr/local/gentoo/usr/lib/libglib-2.0.0.dylib (compatibility version 1601.0.0, current version 1601.1.0) |
| 21 |
> > /usr/lib/libiconv.2.dylib (compatibility version 7.0.0, current version 7.0.0) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> This one is obviously wrong, the rest is correct. Question is, do you |
| 24 |
> have /usr/local/gentoo/lib/libiconv.2.dylib, and if so, what does |
| 25 |
> otool -L /usr/local/gentoo/lib/libiconv.2.dylib report? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
# otool -L /usr/local/gentoo/lib/libiconv.2.dylib |
| 28 |
/usr/local/gentoo/lib/libiconv.2.dylib: |
| 29 |
/usr/local/gentoo/lib/libiconv.2.dylib (compatibility version 7.0.0, current version 7.0.0) |
| 30 |
/usr/local/gentoo/usr/lib/gcc/i686-apple-darwin9/4.0.1/libgcc_s.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.0.0) |
| 31 |
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 111.0.0) |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
bye, Micha |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives