| 1 |
On 18-08-2010 13:01:01 +0800, Galaxy wrote: |
| 2 |
> I ran qdepends on the main Gentoo tree. |
| 3 |
> Since glibc is not a part of the prefix tree, of course it will not contains dependence on glibc there. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> $ ldd /usr/bin/gcc |
| 6 |
> linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff4ab7e000) |
| 7 |
> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007fc0e5e34000) |
| 8 |
> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fc0e6190000) |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Since gcc do linked to libc, |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
(g)libc is not "just a library" in the sense that you can do without. |
| 13 |
Besides that you're not looking at gcc here, but a wrapper around it, |
| 14 |
virtually everything is linked to libc. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> and the version required is >2.8 from the main tree, |
| 17 |
> and I did failed on emerge gcc and binutils at the link step under glibc-2.4. |
| 18 |
> I come to the answer that without glibc-2.8, it cannot be done for gcc-4.4 . |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
We like to see bugs about those. We can't always easily fix it, but |
| 21 |
still a bug would be nice. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> > Anyway, I'm going to gracefully bow out from this thread because it |
| 24 |
> > doesn't make sense anymore. Try to build glibc, please report back when |
| 25 |
> > successful. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> > Good luck, |
| 28 |
> > -Jeremy |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
For the rest, I agree with Jeremy. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 35 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives