1 |
On 11-03-2008 10:18:51 +0100, Duft Markus wrote: |
2 |
> Hi! |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Fabian Groffen <mailto:grobian@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > On 09-03-2008 22:31:33 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
6 |
> >> Well, I have to test what Linux and Solaris do with this, but on |
7 |
> >> Darwin this horribly failed. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> [[...]] |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > (It works on Solaris as intended) |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Not sure wether this is related: |
14 |
> |
15 |
> 103 configure:2717: checking whether the C++ compiler works |
16 |
> 104 configure:2727: ./a.out |
17 |
> 105 ld.so.1: ./a.out: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: version `GCC_4.2.0' not |
18 |
> found (required by file |
19 |
> /net/toolsjunk/mduft/gentoo/sauxy3/usr/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/4.2.3 |
20 |
> /libstdc++.so.6) |
21 |
> 106 ld.so.1: ./a.out: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such |
22 |
> file or directory |
23 |
> 107 ./configure: line 2728: 10967 Killed ./$ac_file |
24 |
> 108 configure:2730: $? = 137 |
25 |
> 109 configure:2739: error: cannot run C++ compiled programs. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I just tried to bootstrap on our solaris box (with gcc 4.2.3 in this |
28 |
> case...). Any hints what to do here? |
29 |
|
30 |
What phase of the bootstrapping process is this? The emerge -e system |
31 |
or something? Otherwise, how do you get that GCC_4.2.0? I thought we |
32 |
don't even have that version in prefix. |
33 |
|
34 |
But, if you didn't "enable" the new versions, you shouldn't actually |
35 |
have anything of the new "layout", all should be the same as it was. |
36 |
|
37 |
What does ldd |
38 |
/net/toolsjunk/mduft/gentoo/sauxy3/usr/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/4.2.3/libstdc++.so.6 |
39 |
result in? scanelf -r on the file? |
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
Fabian Groffen |
44 |
Gentoo on a different level |
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |