| 1 |
On 04-06-2010 19:45:02 +0200, Daniel Vergien wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 04.06.10 12:36, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 04-06-2010 12:27:41 +0200, Daniel Vergien wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> >> If I emerge zlib-1.2.3-r01.1 before it works. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Ah, I see. That's a nasty workaround, but unavoidable for the moment |
| 8 |
> > indeed. Thanks. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> "it works" was a bit to early. After doing "emerge -u system". The |
| 11 |
> "zlib solaris issue" appeared. But after doing the fix in your mail, |
| 12 |
> every try to emerge something fails with: |
| 13 |
> checking for i386-pc-solaris2.10-gcc... i386-pc-solaris2.10-gcc |
| 14 |
> checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: |
| 15 |
> C compiler cannot create executables |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I think this is http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=318679. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> configure:3810: i386-pc-solaris2.10-gcc -c conftest.c >&5 |
| 20 |
> ld.so.1: as: fatal: libz.so.1: version `SUNW_1.1' not found (required by file /nilfisk/gentoo/usr/lib/binutils/i386-pc-solaris2.10/2.20.51.0.4/libbfd-2.20.51.0.4.20091214.so) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
The wrong zlib.so.1 is being loaded, I think. Is the symlink still |
| 23 |
around? I guess not, is it? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 28 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives