1 |
On 27-11-2017 14:31:29 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
2 |
> Hi Fabian, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On 11/27/2017 11:07 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
5 |
> > Hi all, |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > I've just finished removing all few remaining interrevisions (-r0.XY) |
8 |
> > ebuilds from the prefix tree. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > In the next Portage release, interrevision support will be removed. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Please don't! |
13 |
|
14 |
Ok! |
15 |
|
16 |
> > I believe we no longer need to modify ebuilds so often, and keeping this |
17 |
> > feature is now a deviation from mainline which we better avoid. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Although I've not managed yet to submit as GLEP or so, having interrevisions |
20 |
> is quite important to me - and for a meta distribution in general I believe. |
21 |
|
22 |
[snipping reasons as to why interrevisions are useful] |
23 |
|
24 |
Would it be acceptable to "ban" the interrevisions from the prefix-tree, |
25 |
but keep support in Prefix Portage? |
26 |
|
27 |
Thanks, |
28 |
Fabian |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Fabian Groffen |
32 |
Gentoo on a different level |