1 |
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 17:20 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
2 |
> On 17-03-2008 16:20:53 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
3 |
> > On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 15:18 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
4 |
> > > Hey peepz, |
5 |
> > > |
6 |
> > > Triggered by last GMN, in which we got a little PR for haubi and jokey's |
7 |
> > > efforts at Chemnitzer LinuxTage, I went looking at our project page(s), |
8 |
> > > e.g. [1] and started wondering what the name of our project actually |
9 |
> > > should be... Sofar we seem to have: |
10 |
> > > - Gentoo/Alt:Prefix |
11 |
> > > - Gentoo Prefix |
12 |
> > > - Prefix |
13 |
> > > - Prefix Portage |
14 |
> > > - Prefixed Portage |
15 |
> > > - Portage Prefix |
16 |
> > > - Gentoo Prefixed Portage |
17 |
> > > ... |
18 |
> > > |
19 |
> > > Maybe it's time to get consistent, but to what? Any ideas, opinions? |
20 |
> > > (everyone welcome to respond) |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > +1 for "Gentoo Prefix" (in opposite to "Gentoo Linux"): |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > "Some Mac OS X hosting a Gentoo Prefix." |
25 |
> > "Install a Gentoo Prefix on Interix and you are happy." |
26 |
> > "Do your AIX dlls like you can see in Gentoo Prefix." (ehm...) |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> > Or maybe my english is just too bad? |
29 |
> |
30 |
> No opinion on that, but "Gentoo Prefix" may be just the best thing |
31 |
> indeed, Alt is a bit irrelevant here... |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Gentoo Linux, Gentoo/FreeBSD and Gentoo Prefix. With/without '/'? |
34 |
|
35 |
I'd say without '/'. |
36 |
And depending on POV, it may still be consistent with "Gentoo/FreeBSD". |
37 |
|
38 |
/haubi/ |
39 |
-- |
40 |
Michael Haubenwallner |
41 |
Gentoo on a different level |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |