Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] portage failure on fedora-18
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 21:43:18
Message-Id: 20130127214324.GI83094@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-alt] portage failure on fedora-18 by Burcin Erocal
1 On 27-01-2013 22:23:26 +0100, Burcin Erocal wrote:
2 > Hi,
3 >
4 > the following traceback with prefix-portage.2.2.01.21580 was reported
5 > by Volker Braun here [1]:
6
7 could this bug be related to this?
8
9 https://bugs.gentoo.org/454060
10
11 > [1] https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lmnd-devel/TpP4sEhVFrw/discussion
12 > [2] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lmnd-devel/TpP4sEhVFrw/iMnDZU9uTGsJ
13
14 Bootstrapping is in an awkward state currently, because Portage itself
15 makes Python barf on some "write would block" error, cause a complete
16 meltdown.
17
18
19 --
20 Fabian Groffen
21 Gentoo on a different level

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] portage failure on fedora-18 Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-alt] portage failure on fedora-18 Burcin Erocal <burcin@××××××.org>