Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] app-portage/layman
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:35:16
Message-Id: 20100330153417.GD817@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-alt] app-portage/layman by Johan Hattne
1 On 30-03-2010 10:28:29 -0500, Johan Hattne wrote:
2 > Dear all;
3 >
4 > Here's something I don't understand: the portage tree synced from
5 > rsync21.us.gentoo.org on a non-prefix machine has
6 > app-portage/layman-1.3.*, while the latest version in a tree synced from
7 > prefix.gentooexperimental.org on a prefix installation is 1.2.4. The
8 > layman in the prefix tree depends on dev-util/git (which the prefix tree
9 > doesn't have), whereas the non-prefix layman depends on dev-vcs/git
10 > (which the non-prefix tree does have).
11
12 layman is a package with many conflicts, so it hasn't been synced for a
13 while
14
15
16 --
17 Fabian Groffen
18 Gentoo on a different level