| 1 |
On 20-10-2011 13:05:22 +0200, Burcin Erocal wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Ok, ED doesn't make a difference here. Can you explain why the host |
| 3 |
> > system is making world-writable files? What's its rationale to force |
| 4 |
> > that on you? Can't you really not just sanitise that (your umask?) |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:12:53 +0200 |
| 7 |
> From: Alexander Dreyer <alexander.dreyer@×××××××××××××××.de> |
| 8 |
> To: Burcin Erocal <burcin@××××××.org> |
| 9 |
> Cc: gentoo-alt@l.g.o |
| 10 |
> Subject: Re: Fw: [gentoo-alt] permission test |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> You can change these permissions afterwards, but newly generated files |
| 13 |
> are world-writable in the first (this is enforced by the file server). |
| 14 |
> Of course only formally, because the access is restricted by the |
| 15 |
> toplevel ACLs. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> It would already help me a lot, if the warning would not sleep for a |
| 18 |
> second. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Ok, so would the tradeoff to give a warning and sleep only once (the |
| 21 |
sleep perhaps is even misplaced here), instead of for every file be |
| 22 |
acceptable? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 27 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives