| 1 |
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 22:44 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 25-05-2007 22:27:38 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
| 3 |
<snip> |
| 4 |
> > Maybe we should try to not be sticked to binutils-2.16.1 during |
| 5 |
> > bootstrap ? |
| 6 |
> > But wait, prefix-launcher can build binutils-2.17 without texinfo, |
| 7 |
> > although the patch[1] is not applied... |
| 8 |
> > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.alt/2386 |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Problem of that patch is that it is not what we want in the main tree |
| 11 |
> for a normal installation of the package. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> > Btw, I'm bootstrapping an eprefix on sparc-solaris2.9 now too (being one |
| 14 |
> > of the slowest machines here...) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I can imagine... |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I want /var/tmp mountable install stages, so we don't need this hell of |
| 19 |
> getting this crap straight. But I guess for prefix launcher there is no |
| 20 |
> other option then applying the patch and emerging binutils-2.17.* |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Err, prefix-launcher does _not_ apply this patch to binutils-2.17. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Maybe in toolchain-binutils.eclass there is some 'touch' missing on |
| 25 |
texinfo-outputfiles after patching the sources... |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
/haubi/ |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list |
Archives