Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Christoph Junghans <ottxor@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Prefix on a Gentoo host: sharing the Portage tree
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:20:12
Message-Id: CANgp9kxaPkATad13uMs2_bxFNVYxDeS-tn7SgDG-0kfDof1SwQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] Prefix on a Gentoo host: sharing the Portage tree by Alexey Shvetsov
1 2012/8/14 Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o>:
2 > Jeremy Olexa писал 2012-07-24 01:47:
3 >
4 >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Christoph Junghans
5 >> <ottxor@g.o> wrote:
6 >>
7 >>> Can you give us some motivating number how many packages still need to
8 >>> be back-ported to gx86?
9 >>
10 >>
11 >> % pwd
12 >> .../prefix_trunk
13 >> % find . -maxdepth 2 -mindepth 2 -type d | wc -l
14 >> 338
15 >
16 >
17 > It is more interesting how many realy different packages in tree and in
18 > overlay.
19 > There may be only minor difference or some cosmetic changes like keywords
20 I merge a lot of trivial things in the last weeks and filed a lot of
21 bugs (see tracker under
22 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315803)
23 I guess about 20 packages got merged already.
24
25 The main problem is the long response times of the maintainers in gx86.
26
27
28 >
29 >>
30 >> So, roughly 338 packages are still in the prefix repo alone. That is
31 >> down ~30 in 5 months given my past analysis:
32 >>
33 >>
34 >> http://blog.jolexa.net/2012/02/gentoo-prefix-a-look-at-the-number-of-packages/
35 >> So, at the current rate, we can expect the migration to take another
36 >> ~4.5 years.
37 >> -Jeremy
38 >
39 >
40 > --
41 > Best Regards,
42 > Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
43 > Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, NRC Kurchatov Institute, Gatchina,
44 > Russia
45 > Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics
46 > Gentoo Team Ru
47 > Gentoo Linux Dev
48 > mailto:alexxyum@×××××.com
49 > mailto:alexxy@g.o
50 > mailto:alexxy@×××××××××××××.ru
51 >
52
53
54
55 --
56 Christoph Junghans
57 http://dev.gentoo.org/~ottxor/