1 |
2012/8/14 Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o>: |
2 |
> Jeremy Olexa писал 2012-07-24 01:47: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Christoph Junghans |
5 |
>> <ottxor@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>>> Can you give us some motivating number how many packages still need to |
8 |
>>> be back-ported to gx86? |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> % pwd |
12 |
>> .../prefix_trunk |
13 |
>> % find . -maxdepth 2 -mindepth 2 -type d | wc -l |
14 |
>> 338 |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> It is more interesting how many realy different packages in tree and in |
18 |
> overlay. |
19 |
> There may be only minor difference or some cosmetic changes like keywords |
20 |
I merge a lot of trivial things in the last weeks and filed a lot of |
21 |
bugs (see tracker under |
22 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315803) |
23 |
I guess about 20 packages got merged already. |
24 |
|
25 |
The main problem is the long response times of the maintainers in gx86. |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
> |
29 |
>> |
30 |
>> So, roughly 338 packages are still in the prefix repo alone. That is |
31 |
>> down ~30 in 5 months given my past analysis: |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>> http://blog.jolexa.net/2012/02/gentoo-prefix-a-look-at-the-number-of-packages/ |
35 |
>> So, at the current rate, we can expect the migration to take another |
36 |
>> ~4.5 years. |
37 |
>> -Jeremy |
38 |
> |
39 |
> |
40 |
> -- |
41 |
> Best Regards, |
42 |
> Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov |
43 |
> Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, NRC Kurchatov Institute, Gatchina, |
44 |
> Russia |
45 |
> Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics |
46 |
> Gentoo Team Ru |
47 |
> Gentoo Linux Dev |
48 |
> mailto:alexxyum@×××××.com |
49 |
> mailto:alexxy@g.o |
50 |
> mailto:alexxy@×××××××××××××.ru |
51 |
> |
52 |
|
53 |
|
54 |
|
55 |
-- |
56 |
Christoph Junghans |
57 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ottxor/ |