Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:33:07
Message-Id: 20080727143305.GW17546@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-alt] portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue? by Markus Duft
1 On 24-07-2008 14:18:22 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
2 > Hi
3 >
4 > Seems that portage (I have version Portage 2.2.00.11125-prefix) is broken.
5 > Seems that since this version (or maybe a few versions earlier), portage
6 > dooms the environment for fetching files. The environment misses the proxy
7 > variables (http_proxy, ftp_proxy, no_proxy), and thus portage cannot fetch
8 > anything from behind a proxy... it seems that also the PATH variable isn't
9 > set up correctly, since portage misses the wget from it's prefix, and
10 > instead uses another one (cannot tell which one though...)
11
12 zmedico might have fixed this in r11223, it sounds like bug #233103.
13
14
15 --
16 Fabian Groffen
17 Gentoo on a different level