1 |
> |
2 |
> On 16-07-2008 13:50:50 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: |
3 |
> > > |
4 |
> > > I'm doing this with one of the prefixes targeting the setup CDs, so |
5 |
> > > this should be pretty much the most essential stuff :) CFLAGS now |
6 |
> > > should contain _ALL_SOURCE. |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Ok, it's gone pretty much through (allthough i stopped it |
10 |
> prematurely, since I accidently activated the _ALL_SOURCE gcc patch |
11 |
> already :). Now I'll build all packages again, this time with the final |
12 |
> solution (_ALL_SOURCE built-in to gcc). Also I took a quick look over |
13 |
> the tree, and eliminated pretty much all append-flags for _ALL_SOURCE |
14 |
> already. This is gonna be a _huge_ checkin if it works :) |
15 |
> |
16 |
> good! |
17 |
|
18 |
Yeeeha... it seems to work fine. I'll commit the gcc patch now, and the rest tomorrow? Or should I just commit everything? If things don't build anywhere, one would have to reinstall gcc. Should I rev-bump gcc? |
19 |
|
20 |
Cheers, Markus |
21 |
|
22 |
> |
23 |
> > The only thing that came to my mind that could be a problem: while |
24 |
> bootstrapping as long as there is no gcc of our own, there could be |
25 |
> problems building things. Should we just set C[XX]FLAGS during |
26 |
> bootstrap? I can do it in eprefix-bootstrap - do you plan to create |
27 |
> some manual bootstrap guide for interix too? |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Yes. Like we need to set -L -R stuff, we just have to set the define, |
30 |
> until we emerged gcc. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> |
33 |
> -- |
34 |
> Fabian Groffen |
35 |
> Gentoo on a different level |
36 |
> -- |
37 |
> gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |