| 1 |
09.11.2010, 12:06, "Fabian Groffen" <grobian@g.o>: |
| 2 |
> On 09-11-2010 12:02:42 +0300, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>> šactually none are keyworded ppc64-macos. |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> šIt is not safe to assume that what compiles on ppc(-linux) also compiles |
| 7 |
>>> šon ppc-macos. šWhile it is likely that *-macos all or none compile, it |
| 8 |
>>> šis also best to first verify that, before assuming it is. |
| 9 |
>> šHmm, I hoped that most of *-macos should at least compile :) |
| 10 |
>> š(I didn't explore very many packages, but most of ~ppc-macos do compile) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> If the keyword ~ppc-macos is there, the package should compile on that |
| 13 |
> platform, that's the idea. šDue to it being by primary development |
| 14 |
> platform, this arch has traditionally always been the best represented |
| 15 |
> one: |
| 16 |
> http://stats.prefix.freens.org/keywords-packages.png |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I've meant that if ebuild compiles on *both* ppc and Y-macos (Y - other arch), |
| 19 |
it probably works on ppc-macos because: |
| 20 |
1) it supports PowerPC |
| 21 |
2) it supports Gentoo Prefix |
| 22 |
3) is supports Mac OS X |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I think it could be extrapolated to other cases like ebuild keyworded on X and |
| 25 |
Y-platform will probably work for X-platform |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Regards, |
| 29 |
Konstantin |
Archives
