Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Bacchella Fabrice <fabrice.bacchella@×××××××.com>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] bug in bootstrap-prefix.sh
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 12:15:16
Message-Id: DE8B410E-3BB1-4028-A149-9436DA15A54C@exalead.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] bug in bootstrap-prefix.sh by Fabian Groffen
1 Le 19 mai 08 à 14:08, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
2
3 > On 19-05-2008 14:06:41 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
4 >>
5 >> Le 19 mai 08 à 13:58, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
6 >>
7 >>> On 19-05-2008 13:55:12 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
8 >>>> bin/bash and bin/rbash are here, but not bin/sh. Everything else is
9 >>>> fine.
10 >>>
11 >>> ok, then I have to figure out why symlinking fails. Will fix the
12 >>> gcc
13 >>> ebuilds later anyway.
14 >>>
15 >> I think the easiest and less brittle way is o create bin and sbin ?
16 >> Is
17 >> there a reason not to do that ?
18 >
19 > From your initial email I undestood that we actually create that dir,
20 > and that it breaks. ??? Just creating $EPREFIX/bin and $EPREFIX/
21 > sbin is
22 > fine with me, and a very little effort if it just fixes this
23 > problem...
24
25 Oups, my explanation was not clear then. It's NOT creating it that is
26 the problem.
27
28 >
29 >
30 >
31 > --
32 > Fabian Groffen
33 > Gentoo on a different level
34 > --
35 > gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list
36 >
37
38 --
39 gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] bug in bootstrap-prefix.sh Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>