| 1 |
On 03-02-2014 18:40:49 +0900, heroxbd@g.o wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ruud Koolen <redlizard@g.o> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > I agree with being conservative, but I am kind of allergic to the idea |
| 5 |
> > of holding back useful progress *indefinitely* in the name of not |
| 6 |
> > fixing what isn't broken; there must be SOME mountain of due care |
| 7 |
> > large enough to overcome that consideration. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Haha, don't be allergic, man. It's the reality and I've surrendered to |
| 10 |
> it. Besides, I'm no longer hard working. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Not sure if this boils down to me, but anyway, I was about to suggest |
| 13 |
you create whatever you think is the working solution, and then I'll |
| 14 |
just run it on my boxes to see what happens. I know many hours and |
| 15 |
efforts went into getting the process as robust as possible, so not |
| 16 |
willing to just throw it away, but am open to proof that it can be |
| 17 |
easier and better. In the end, I'd love to have RAP enabled for all |
| 18 |
Linux installs, because it simply makes sense there. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Fabian |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 24 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives