| 1 |
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 13:48 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10-01-2010 12:39:31 +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 16:36 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On 09-01-2010 16:09:21 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > > I also still need to put ... |
| 6 |
> > > > > |
| 7 |
> > > > > mysettings["EPREFIX"] = EPREFIX.rstrip(os.path.sep) |
| 8 |
> > > > |
| 9 |
> > > > Ok, I added that back. |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > I fixed the backtrace (hopefully) too. Can you try 2.2.00.15184? |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > I get this now when EPREFIX is "" |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > File "/j/usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/__init__.py", line 1178, in |
| 17 |
> > dolinkingstuff |
| 18 |
> > if "CHOST" in env and "CBUILD" in env and \ |
| 19 |
> > TypeError: argument of type 'module' is not iterable |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> can you try the attached patch? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
That fixes that problem, but when I update net-misc/neon from 0.29.1 to |
| 26 |
0.29.2 I'm getting this, but the files it's complaining about don't |
| 27 |
exist. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
>>> Installing (1 of 1) net-misc/neon-0.29.2 |
| 30 |
* This package will overwrite one or more files that may belong to |
| 31 |
other |
| 32 |
* packages (see list below). You can use a command such as `portageq |
| 33 |
* owners / <filename>` to identify the installed package that owns a |
| 34 |
* file. If portageq reports that only one package owns a file then do |
| 35 |
* NOT file a bug report. A bug report is only useful if it identifies |
| 36 |
at |
| 37 |
* least two or more packages that are known to install the same |
| 38 |
file(s). |
| 39 |
* If a collision occurs and you can not explain where the file came |
| 40 |
from |
| 41 |
* then you should simply ignore the collision since there is not enough |
| 42 |
* information to determine if a real problem exists. Please do NOT file |
| 43 |
* a bug report at http://bugs.gentoo.org unless you report exactly |
| 44 |
which |
| 45 |
* two packages install the same file(s). Once again, please do NOT file |
| 46 |
* a bug report unless you have completely understood the above message. |
| 47 |
* |
| 48 |
* package net-misc/neon-0.29.2 NOT merged |
| 49 |
* |
| 50 |
* Detected file collision(s): |
| 51 |
* |
| 52 |
* /usr/share/doc/neon-0.29.2/BUGS.bz2 |
| 53 |
* /usr/share/doc/neon-0.29.2/TODO.bz2 |
| 54 |
* /usr/share/doc/neon-0.29.2/AUTHORS.bz2 |
| 55 |
* /usr/share/doc/neon-0.29.2/NEWS.bz2 |
| 56 |
* /usr/share/doc/neon-0.29.2/README.bz2 |
| 57 |
* /usr/share/doc/neon-0.29.2/THANKS.bz2 |
| 58 |
* |
| 59 |
* Searching all installed packages for file collisions... |
| 60 |
* |
| 61 |
* Press Ctrl-C to Stop |
| 62 |
* |
| 63 |
* None of the installed packages claim the file(s). |
| 64 |
* |
| 65 |
* Package 'net-misc/neon-0.29.2' NOT merged due to file collisions. If |
| 66 |
* necessary, refer to your elog messages for the whole content of the |
| 67 |
* above message. |
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
Alan. |
Archives