| 1 |
On 30-10-2008 17:04:07 -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
| 2 |
> You are right, I am wrong. I shoudn't have assumed that poppler-0.10.0 |
| 3 |
> would behave the same as 0.8.7 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -Wall -Wno-write-strings -O2 -pipe |
| 6 |
> -fomit-frame-pointer -o .libs/perf-test perf-test.o |
| 7 |
> perf-test-preview-dummy.o ../poppler/.libs/libpoppler.so |
| 8 |
> /usr/lib64/libfreetype.so -lopenjpeg -lz -Wl,--rpath |
| 9 |
> -Wl,/home/jolexa/portage/linux-64/usr/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/lib64 |
| 10 |
> /home/jolexa/portage/linux-64/usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1: undefined |
| 11 |
> reference to `FT_Select_Size' |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> So the question remains, where does that /usr/lib64/libfreetype.so bit |
| 14 |
> come from and how do we fix it? Nothing jumps out at me in config.log |
| 15 |
> and the Makefile. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
probably a customised libtool or a xxxx-config --libs that returns it. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 22 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives