Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Bacchella Fabrice <fabrice.bacchella@×××××××.com>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Another findutils failed (but on Solaris)
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 13:46:18
Message-Id: 1309C314-3355-4BDA-B86C-39DF5ACEFDD1@exalead.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] Another findutils failed (but on Solaris) by Fabian Groffen
1 Le 7 mai 08 à 22:15, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
2
3 > On 07-05-2008 22:05:48 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
4 >>
5 >> Le 7 mai 08 à 20:35, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
6 >>>
7 >>> Hehe....
8 >>> are you bootstrapping?
9 >>>
10 >>> 64-bits Solaris isn't in my usual testing stage. I'll see what I
11 >>> encounter.
12 >>
13 >> Yes, still. I'm bonehead about bootstrapping 64bits without a
14 >> glitch. It's
15 >> not just for playing, but a big production environnment.--
16 >
17 > I think that your way of bootstrapping 64-bits is causing the trouble.
18 > I have no problem compiling findutils using a Prefix compiler. Please
19 > try the bootstrap instructions, which differ slightly from yours. It
20 > does initial bootstrapping 32-bits, and continues 64-bits via a
21 > 64-native compiler.
22
23
24 I tried this. No more success. When I download the patched findutils,
25 a plain configure, make installed failed, even after an
26 unset CC CFLAGS CCC CXX CXXFLAGS LDFLAGS CPPFLAGS LD_LIBRARY_PATH LANG
27 umask=0000
28
29
30
31 --
32 gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] Another findutils failed (but on Solaris) Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>