| 1 |
On 04-04-2007 18:11:31 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> readline-5.2 has been built shared already, but the symlinks |
| 5 |
> "libreadline.so -> libreadline.so.5" were missing. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> [readline-5.2-aix5.patch] fixes that. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Added, committed, thanks. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> But this triggers another problem with QA checks in portage itself, |
| 12 |
> because the QA check for existing gen_usr_ldscripts fails. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> [portage-gen-usr-ldscript.patch] fixes that. |
| 15 |
> Thus we need either a patch on portage in the tree or a new portage |
| 16 |
> release before that readline-patch applied. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I already commented on this patch, as I have some questions on it. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 23 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list |
Archives