| 1 |
On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 16:21 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 11-03-2008 16:14:16 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Grobian, |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > wanted to commit an ebuild containing these lines: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > IUSE="hppa" |
| 8 |
> > ... |
| 9 |
> > use hppa && replace-flags -O2 -O1 |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > But now, repoman complains: |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > IUSE.invalid 1 |
| 14 |
> > app-text/openjade/openjade-1.3.2-r1.ebuild: hppa |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > How should we handle such situations (for any "arch" seen in main-tree |
| 17 |
> > where "arch-linux" is missing in prefix) ? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> "arch" should NEVER be in IUSE. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> > 1) rename 'hppa' to 'hppa-linux' and add it to profiles/arch.list |
| 22 |
> > 2) simply keep 'hppa' in profiles/arch.list |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> 3) Kick out this annoying repoman patch which made this check fatal |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
nope - it's good that it's fatal... |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> by the way, if I run repoman full on openjade as it is in the tree now, |
| 30 |
> it doesn't complain for me, does it for you? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
wth - damn, have overlooked that mduft added hppa to IUSE - the single |
| 33 |
one he did because of QA warnings during merge... |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
/blind proxy/ |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Michael Haubenwallner |
| 38 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives