Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@×××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: cmake eclass fix
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:34:03
Message-Id: 4E8CDB4E.7080006@fairlite.co.uk
In Reply to: [gentoo-alt] Re: cmake eclass fix by Jonathan Callen
1 On 10/05/11 22:39, Jonathan Callen wrote:
2 > On 10/05/2011 03:01 PM, Alan Hourihane wrote:
3 > > On 10/04/11 11:24, Alan Hourihane wrote:
4 > >> On 10/04/11 11:21, Alan Hourihane wrote:
5 > >>> On 08/14/11 19:05, Alan Hourihane wrote:
6 > >>>> On 08/14/11 11:40, Fabian Groffen wrote:
7 > >>>>> On 07-07-2011 15:42:40 +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
8 > >>>>>> Hi all,
9 > >>>>>>
10 > >>>>>> Can someone replace the link the cmake eclass that says
11 > >>>>>> ....
12 > >>>>>>
13 > >>>>>> if use prefix; then
14 > >>>>>>
15 > >>>>>> to
16 > >>>>>>
17 > >>>>>> if use prefix && ! EPREFIX=; then
18 > >>>>> Why is that necessary? Or is it MiNT that doesn't like the
19 > >>>>> RPATH stuff?
20 > >>>>>
21 > >>>> Yes, it's the RPATH stuff that messes things up when
22 > >>>> EPREFIX=/
23 > >>>>
24 > >>> Any better fix for this ?
25 > >>>
26 > >>> Alan.
27 > >> if use prefix && "${EPREFIX}" != ""; then
28 > >>
29 > >> The above is better. Can this be committed ?
30 > >>
31 >
32 > > Actually this works for me.....
33 >
34 > > if use prefix && ! ${EPREFIX}; then
35 >
36 > > Alan.
37 >
38 >
39 > I hope you meant:
40 >
41 > if use prefix && ! [[ ${EPREFIX} ]]; then
42 >
43 I'd be fine with that :-)
44
45 Alan.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: cmake eclass fix Michael Haubenwallner <haubi@g.o>