| 1 |
I was indeed using USE=vanilla to get gcc 4.5.3 to compile and it |
| 2 |
appears that all my issues where caused by this useflag. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
So I removed this useflag and masked >sys-devel/gcc-4.2.4-r01. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Thanks a lot! |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Regards, |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Nicolas |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 13 |
> On 23-10-2011 23:36:12 -0400, Martin Luessi wrote: |
| 14 |
>> Did you by any chance emerge gcc with the "vanilla" useflag enabled? I |
| 15 |
>> am asking since I had similar problems when I was installing |
| 16 |
>> gentoo-prefix on CentOS a few weeks ago. Gcc 4.5.3 wouldn't compile |
| 17 |
>> without the "vanilla" useflag enabled, so I enabled it. After that |
| 18 |
>> many packages failed to compile since they were being linked against |
| 19 |
>> system libraries instead of the prefix ones. What I did is mask gcc |
| 20 |
>> versions that are too new (>4.2.4 in my case) to be compatible with |
| 21 |
>> the CentOs glibc. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Oh, thanks for the hint. I guess we should either mask vanilla, or |
| 24 |
> apply the critial prefix patches for this regardless of USE=vanilla. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Mind filing a bug for this? |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Thanks a lot for the insight! |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> -- |
| 32 |
> Fabian Groffen |
| 33 |
> Gentoo on a different level |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Nicolas Pinto |
| 40 |
http://web.mit.edu/pinto |
Archives