| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I just got really confused. I was just working on |
| 4 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195761 and despite mentioning in |
| 5 |
comment #8 that the compilation breaks, I tried to verify at least that |
| 6 |
it would work by checking if Makefile.in is properly generated from |
| 7 |
Makefile.am. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Since it is not and I was also not seeing a call to automake I had a |
| 10 |
look at ${EPREFIX}/usr/portage/eclass/autotools.eclass. Judged by what I |
| 11 |
see between line 76-106 there and taking into account what happens in |
| 12 |
libtool.eclass line 116-375 it looks to me that autoconf is always |
| 13 |
called before automake and would thus be effectively preventing any |
| 14 |
propagation of changes from Makefile.am's. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
It would work though, if there are eventually dependencies generated in |
| 17 |
the Makefile to rebuild and rerun configure if these files changed, but |
| 18 |
I don't remember to have seen that (running configure twice and |
| 19 |
optionally loosing CFLAGS) in the past. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I would be very delighted if someone could let me know what I'm not |
| 22 |
getting. I'm using revision 12104 of both eclasses. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Thanks, |
| 25 |
Dirk. |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list |
Archives