| 1 |
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:24:45 +0100, Ramon van Alteren |
| 2 |
<ramon@××××××××××.nl> |
| 3 |
wrote: |
| 4 |
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 02:50:20PM +0000, Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:37:55 +0100, Ramon van Alteren |
| 7 |
>> Yea, it could be documented better. But don't expect much unless this |
| 8 |
bug |
| 9 |
>> is resolved and added to portage proper http://bugs.gentoo.org/155161 |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I read through the bug briefly, but couldn't find a clear problem that's |
| 12 |
> holding back it's acceptance. Other than "there are |
| 13 |
> nicer/cleaner/eleganter ways to do it :) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Well yea, not everything *has* to be accepted into portage trunk. Its up |
| 16 |
to the portage devs. :) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Thanx, that was exactly the documentation part that I was looking for. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
np. searching on bugs.gentoo.org is easy. heh. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Regards, |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Ramon |
Archives