| 1 |
On 15-05-2008 08:52:16 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: |
| 2 |
> > That feels like an awfully ugly hack. Sorry to say so. Gives me an |
| 3 |
> > idea on where/why/how though... |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I know it's an ugly hack, yes, and I feel it's really a bug in the |
| 6 |
> binutils build mechanism, since that should set the rpath correctly |
| 7 |
> for it's own prefix. But I'm not sure if there wasn't more than just |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
It *does* for Linux and Solaris at least... |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> binutils requiring the explicit runpath. Also this is just during |
| 12 |
> bootstrap, so I can cope with that - in the real prefix the |
| 13 |
> binutils-config does exactly the same thing, so.... |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Not really. It's just luck it works then. Each binutils should point |
| 16 |
to its own libs IMO, instead of the libs of the currently selected |
| 17 |
binutils. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
For some reason my interix has crippled down to 48K8 modumb speed, where |
| 20 |
even readline recall (as in arrow up) in bash seems to make the machine |
| 21 |
go into a hefty calculation session, so if I'm progressing, it is really |
| 22 |
really REALLY slowly. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 27 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives