Archives
Archives
| From: | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-alt@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-alt] Perl 5.16.x on Prefix ? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:07:29 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20120821121236.GO10705@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-alt] Perl 5.16.x on Prefix ? by Alan Hourihane |
||
| 1 | On 21-08-2012 10:23:01 +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote: |
| 2 | > Hi all, |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > I talked to Jeremy about this last night, but it seems perl 5.16.x |
| 5 | > hasn't been adjusted for Prefix. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > The patches aren't applied and it's a much reduced ebuild. Has anyone |
| 8 | > tested 5.16.x on prefix yet ? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | 5.16.1 is on all my boxes, and it has done all the bootstraps of the |
| 11 | last few weeks... The magic is in the eblits now. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Fabian Groffen |
| 15 | Gentoo on a different level |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-alt] Perl 5.16.x on Prefix ? | Alan Hourihane <alanh@×××××××××××.uk> |
| Re: [gentoo-alt] Perl 5.16.x on Prefix ? | Alan Hourihane <alanh@×××××××××××.uk> |