Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: John Gibson <jgibson@×××××.org>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] [AIX] x11-libs/gtk+ fails to compile
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:41:39
Message-Id: D7A7CEB4-169D-4D5E-8978-C09BE197C61A@mitre.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] [AIX] x11-libs/gtk+ fails to compile by Marshall McMullen
1 Yes, many moons ago I emerged gtk+-2.10.13 on OS-X Intel, but I'm not
2 sure if I really ran anything with it. I was trying to get something
3 from Gnome working (the terminal probably), but some other dependency
4 failed and I never took the time to sort it all out.
5
6 John
7
8 On Nov 19, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Marshall McMullen wrote:
9
10 > Crap, no such luck. I copied the file from ../gdk-pixbuf/gdk-
11 > pixbuf.loaders into the directory it was looking for it in, but it
12 > still fails. This time silently with no error message other than
13 > the same original message about the cache being invalid.
14 >
15 > Has anyone else successfully emerged gtk+ in prefixed gentoo yet ?
16 >
17 > Thanks....
18 >
19 > ----- Original Message -----
20 > From: "Marshall McMullen" <marshall.mcmullen@×××××.com>
21 > To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
22 > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 10:21:02 AM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago
23 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] [AIX] x11-libs/gtk+ fails to compile
24 >
25 > OH! I think I found a hint to the problem here. When I run the
26 > failing command manually, it says:
27 >
28 > (lt-gtk-update-icon-cache:716840): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: Cannot
29 > open pixbuf loader module file '/gsa/ausgsa/projects/g/gnu/etc/
30 > gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf.loaders': A file or directory in the path name
31 > does not exist.
32 >
33 > Not sure why that isn't present. Going to see if I can look into
34 > what's wrong here.
35 >
36 > Thanks.
37 >
38 > ----- Original Message -----
39 > From: "Marshall McMullen" <marshall.mcmullen@×××××.com>
40 > To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
41 > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 10:19:01 AM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago
42 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] [AIX] x11-libs/gtk+ fails to compile
43 >
44 > Yes, there is a lot in gtkbuiltincache.h, here are the first 30 lines:
45 >
46 > $ head -30 gtkbuiltincache.h
47 > #ifdef __SUNPRO_C
48 > #pragma align 4 (builtin_icons)
49 > #endif
50 > #ifdef __GNUC__
51 > static const guint8 builtin_icons[] __attribute__ ((__aligned__
52 > (4))) =
53 > #else
54 > static const guint8 builtin_icons[] =
55 > #endif
56 > {
57 > 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x0c, 0x00, 0x06, 0x03,
58 > 0xbc,
59 > 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x49, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x34, 0x00, 0x00, 0x29,
60 > 0xb4,
61 > 0x00, 0x00, 0x37, 0x3c, 0x00, 0x00, 0x52, 0x3c, 0x00, 0x00, 0x91,
62 > 0x90,
63 > 0x00, 0x00, 0xac, 0x90, 0x00, 0x00, 0xc7, 0x8c, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
64 > 0xff,
65 > 0x00, 0x00, 0xd5, 0x0c, 0x00, 0x00, 0xfd, 0x98, 0x00, 0x01, 0x0b,
66 > 0x14,
67 > 0x00, 0x01, 0x41, 0x08, 0x00, 0x01, 0x4e, 0x84, 0x00, 0x01, 0x84,
68 > 0x80,
69 > 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0x00, 0x01, 0x92, 0x00, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
70 > 0xff,
71 > 0x00, 0x01, 0xba, 0x94, 0x00, 0x01, 0xce, 0xa0, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
72 > 0xff,
73 > 0x00, 0x02, 0x00, 0x74, 0x00, 0x02, 0x1b, 0x74, 0x00, 0x02, 0x51,
74 > 0x74,
75 > 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0x00, 0x02, 0x87, 0x74, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
76 > 0xff,
77 > 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0x00, 0x02, 0x94,
78 > 0xfc,
79 > 0x00, 0x02, 0xbd, 0x84, 0x00, 0x02, 0xf3, 0x94, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
80 > 0xff,
81 > 0x00, 0x03, 0x37, 0x24, 0x00, 0x03, 0x55, 0x04, 0x00, 0x03, 0x62,
82 > 0x80,
83 > 0x00, 0x03, 0x6f, 0xfc, 0x00, 0x03, 0xa1, 0xd4, 0x00, 0x03, 0xbc,
84 > 0xd8,
85 > 0x00, 0x03, 0xd7, 0xd8, 0x00, 0x03, 0xe5, 0x94, 0x00, 0x03, 0xf9,
86 > 0x9c,
87 > 0x00, 0x04, 0x07, 0x1c, 0x00, 0x04, 0x46, 0x70, 0x00, 0x04, 0x53,
88 > 0xf0,
89 > 0x00, 0x04, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x00, 0x04, 0x67, 0xf4, 0x00, 0x04, 0x83,
90 > 0x30,
91 > 0x00, 0x04, 0x97, 0x9c, 0x00, 0x04, 0xb2, 0xa8, 0x00, 0x04, 0xb2,
92 > 0xf0,
93 > 0x00, 0x04, 0xc0, 0x70, 0x00, 0x04, 0xf2, 0x4c, 0x00, 0x04, 0xff,
94 > 0xd0,
95 > 0x00, 0x05, 0x13, 0xdc, 0x00, 0x05, 0x14, 0x20, 0x00, 0x05, 0x21,
96 > 0xa8,
97 > 0x00, 0x05, 0x21, 0xf0, 0x00, 0x05, 0x2f, 0x6c, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
98 > 0xff,
99 >
100 > ...
101 >
102 > Any other ideas ?
103 >
104 > ----- Original Message -----
105 > From: "Fabian Groffen" <grobian@g.o>
106 > To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
107 > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 4:05:59 AM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago
108 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] [AIX] x11-libs/gtk+ fails to compile
109 >
110 > On 19-11-2007 05:31:05 +0000, Marshall McMullen wrote:
111 >> I've been trying to get gtk+ emerged on AIX 5.3, but it fails
112 >> during compilation with:
113 >>
114 >> creating gtk-update-icon-cache
115 >> make[3]: Leaving directory `/gsa/ausgsa-p5/15/gnu/var/tmp/portage/
116 >> x11-libs/gtk+-2.12.1-r1/work/gtk+-2.12.1/gtk'
117 >> GDK_PIXBUF_MODULE_FILE=../gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf.loaders ./gtk-
118 >> update-icon-cache --force --ignore-theme-index \
119 >> --source builtin_icons stock-icons > gtkbuiltincache.h.tmp && \
120 >> mv gtkbuiltincache.h.tmp gtkbuiltincache.h
121 >> The generated cache was invalid.
122 >> make[2]: *** [gtkbuiltincache.h] Error 1
123 >> make[2]: Leaving directory `/gsa/ausgsa-p5/15/gnu/var/tmp/portage/
124 >> x11-libs/gtk+-2.12.1-r1/work/gtk+-2.12.1/gtk'
125 >> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
126 >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/gsa/ausgsa-p5/15/gnu/var/tmp/portage/
127 >> x11-libs/gtk+-2.12.1-r1/work/gtk+-2.12.1'
128 >> make: *** [all] Error 2
129 >>
130 >> Has anyone else seen this problem or found a way around it ?
131 >
132 > No, but is there something in the file gtkbuiltincache.h?
133 >
134 >
135 > --
136 > Fabian Groffen
137 > Gentoo on a different level
138 > --
139 > gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list
140 >
141 >
142 > --
143 > gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list
144 >
145 >
146 > --
147 > gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list
148 >
149
150 --
151 gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list