Re: [gentoo-alt] [PREFIX] portage masked?

[Fabian Groffen]

On 13-02-2008 10:46:56 +1000, Peter Ansell wrote:
> On 13/02/2008, Aaron Wilson <tallest@×××××.com> wrote:
> > On both of my Leopard 10.5.2 prefixed machines after a fresh sync I get:
> >
> > $ emerge portage
> >
> > These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
> >
> > - sys-apps/portage-2.2.00.9271 (masked by: package.mask)
> > /Users/wilson/Library/Gentoo/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
> > # Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> (09 Feb 2008)
> > # First public test releases of portage-2.2
> >
> > - sys-apps/portage-2.2.00.9233 (masked by: package.mask)

> I get the same thing, strange thing for me is that I did a bootstrap
> install two days ago and it worked perfectly. It looks possibly like a
> portage developer has masked the 9271 version in the main profile out
> and that has flowed on to hide the version which I used for my
> bootstrap.

Thanks!  In fact, the main portage guys masked 2.2 entirely, whereas
Prefix needs this, so I'll unmask in prefix.  Sorry for the
inconvenience!

-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
-- 
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list